The Psychology of Money

Morgan Housel, 2020

Doing well with money isn't necessarily about what you know. It's about how you behave. And behaviour is hard to teach, even to really smart people.

Rating:
4.5/5
Summary

"The Psychology of Money" is an eye-opening book that explores how our emotions, behaviors, and habits can affect our financial decisions. With relatable stories and real-life examples, Morgan Housel breaks down complex concepts into simple and actionable insights. Learn why investing isn't just about money, the role of luck in financial success, and the power of compounding, among many other lessons.

Key takeaways
  • Savings = Income - Ego.
  • Reasonable > Rational. Aiming to be mostly reasonable works better than trying to be coldly rational.
  • We should focus on how we think about money, rather than just increasing our knowledge about money.
Impressions

An engaging and thought-provoking read that challenges readers to think differently about their relationship with money. Housel's writing style is accessible and easy to understand, making complex concepts easy to grasp. The book is full of interesting anecdotes and real-life examples that bring the concepts to life and make them relevant to readers' lives. It is suitable for first-time readers who are new to the subject and want to develop good financial habits.

Spending money to show people how much money you have is the fastest way to have less money.
What Others are Saying

1. I came for Money lesson, yet I got a life lesson

2. …the author is not trying to tell anything extraordinary in this book but trying to make us clearly understand some simple things and make our basics correct.

3. A very well written and well explained book and must read for all those people who are careless with money specifically.

4. Featuring 19 anecdotal chapters that tap into the emotional aspect of our relationship with money, the book does little except offer stories that can all be summarized in this format - "People's reaction to (chapter theme) could be X but it could also be Y", which is my least preferred takeaway format from any book. The trouble is, nothing that he says is wrong. It's just inconclusive.